Search

the.educationalizer

Tag

Edtech

Bookmark This! #2

Here are a few more useful links for teachers. Get those bookmarking fingers ready.

  1. Triptico
    This site features a bunch of cool tools and games that work well in the classroom. A lot of them are ‘Premium’ now, which sucks, because many of them are great. Still, there are useful freebies. My personal favorite in the hourglass timer.
    triptico01
  2.  Teaching with Songs
    Songs are great; they liven up class and students really enjoy them. There’s a lot you can do with them, from vocabulary to grammar to a variety of skills. Thanks to the YouTube and lyrics sites, it’s easier than ever to use songs in your lessons. This site can help you find the right song and some exercises to go with them. And there are tons of recent pop songs.
  3. Movie Segments to Assess Grammar Goals
    This site is an excellent site. There are dozens of video from popular movies associated with different grammar topics. The activities aren’t always perfect, but they’re often a good place to start.
  4. TV Subtitles
    Songs aren’t the only way to make class more fun. TV shows can be another great resource of authentic language, and they’re inherently more interesting than the average coursebook. The trouble is, for ESL students whose listening skills aren’t developed enough, understanding the dialogue can be challenging. With this site, you can find subtitles for most recent TV shows.
  5. Padlet
    padletThis site is great. You create a new padlet page and share the url with your students. They can then add comments, questions, links, or the like and everyone will see them on the page. They can do it anonymously if they want. This can be a very useful way for students to ask questions or offer comments without having to raise their hands or speak in front of their classmates.

Getting Away from “Edtech for Tech’s Sake”

In 2013, the Los Angeles Unified School District began handing out iPads to its 650,000 students. This program was heralded as a great success for educational technology. Two years later, the massive school district halted the program and demanded a refund from Pearson and Apple. The program was not just a failure; it was a debacle. The curriculum and apps from Pearson were worthless in most cases, according to many of the teachers who tried to integrate the tools into their lessons, and the program’s failure highlighted just how difficult Edtech really is.

studentusingipad
Photo by Lexie Flickinger/Brad Flickinger via Flickr Creative Commons

This story can be heard in many places, though few had the $1.3 billion price tag attached like it was in LA. Schools rush to buy laptops or tablets, through on some nanny software to keep the kids from looking at porn or playing League of Legends too easily, and hope their teachers can find some use for them. This is Edtech for tech’s sake. A principal or school board wants to not be seen as behind the times, to keep up with the charters, to help disadvantaged students. The reasons range from the banal to the saintly. But no matter how good your intentions are, if you haven’t approached the situation correctly, you’re joining the road crew paving the way to Hell.

Any use of Edtech, or just about any innovation or change, needs to start with identifying a need. What are the students missing? What are the holes in the curriculum? Where are the teachers struggling? If the answer to those problems is Edtech, then mazel tov. But far too often, the answer is going to be whatever pet project some stakeholder is trumpeting, regardless of the problem that may or not have been identified yet.

I’ve seen it several times in my program. A teacher will give a workshop on a cool app, and several of us might try it. Sometimes it’s great. Sometimes, meh. More often than not, they’re bookmarked and forgotten about. In an ideal environment, we would start with some problem and search for the best answer, which may well be an Edtech one.

googledocsI recently began to have my students submit their weekly writing assignments to me via Google docs, a service I’ve been using for years. My decision to integrate this tool into my class had to do with a hole I’ve noticed. The students do their writing, but we only give quick, mostly general feedback on content and grammar/vocabulary errors during their tutorial time, assuming they actually come. This level of feedback wasn’t sufficient, I felt, and the students probably forgot most of it as soon as they left the lesson. With a tool like Google docs, I can make in-line edits and give comments which they can see easily whenever they review for the writing tests.

So far, I would say that it is a not-unqualified success, but it is still early in the module. Some of the students have definitely indicated that they like the comments; on the other hand, it’s added a time burden to my workload, somewhat off-set by the ease of which it is to use Gdocs anywhere anytime. The first test for my efforts will be next week when they have their first of four writing tests. I don’t think this is going to be a panacea. My group of students began with rather below writing skills for the Intermediate level, and giving feedback with Gdocs isn’t going to work miracles. If it helps them to stop making subject-verb agreement errors and capitalizing words after commas, I’ll be happy.

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑